Judgment handed down in Malik v Malik
Law firm Stephenson Harwood LLP has advised a longstanding client, Mr Malik, on a successful outcome in Malik v Malik [2025] EWHC 2485 (Ch), a heavily-contested jurisdiction challenge arising from a complex family dispute.
The High Court ruled that England was not the appropriate forum (forum conveniens) for the proceedings, that service (if even effected) should be set aside, and further that the claim was strikeable on the grounds of abuse of process.
The Stephenson Harwood team was led by partner Adam Polonsky, who instructed James Kinman of Maitland Chambers. James has appeared in a number of connected applications relating to the underlying claim.
記事をシェアする
関連する専門知識
関連記事
Injunctions against bond calls: A reminder of the high threshold - TTSJV V BAPCO
Commercial Litigation
Stephenson Harwood wins ‘Disputes Team Of The Year'
International Arbitration
Marine insurance specialist Dr Jennifer Lavelle joins Stephenson Harwood as Partner
Commercial Litigation
When does "warehousing" tip into abuse? Cooke, Young & Keidan LLP v Davis
Commercial Litigation
What next for the FCA ‘s Motor Finance Compensation Scheme?
Financial Services Regulation
Minibonds - still a problem, or problem solved?
Financial Services Regulation
APP fraud, Electronic Money Institutions, derivative claims and Quincecare: more questions than answers in Moorwand v Hamblin
Commercial Litigation
The cost of redress: the evolving role of cost–benefit analysis in certifying opt-out collective actions
Competition Litigation
The UK Market Abuse Regime for Cryptoassets (“MARC”) – the FCA’s final rules
Financial Services Regulation
Court of Appeal upholds solicitor's conviction and clarifies scope of POCA tipping off offence
Regulatory Disputes